The legal case against OpenAI is so bad that it is hilarious
Elon Musk’s lawsuit against AI startup OpenAI, which was founded in 2015, accuses the firm of violating its founding principles. The lawsuit states that OpenAI President Greg Brockman breached the company’s founding principles by abandoning the principles over the years. The lawsuit further says that Brockman had approached Musk in 2015 out of shared concerns over the risks of AI.
Musk sued OpenAI because it left its mission to benefit humanity
Elon Musk’s AI company OpenAI has been “converted” into a closed-source subsidiary of Microsoft, a lawsuit claimed. “OpenAI is not just developing but is refining an AGI [Artificial General Intelligence] to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for thebenefit of humanity,” the filing said. “On information and belief, GPT-4 is an AGI algorithm,” it added.
Voters send a message to Biden on Gaza
The US State Department said that President Joe Biden’s recent call for a cease-fire in the Israel-friendly Golan Heights was in line with US policy. Biden had said in an interview that Israel’s Golan Heights is “a strategic asset” for America. Earlier this month, the US Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryo’s are children under the wrongful death law.
Ford is first in line with other electric vehicles now that the Charging Network is open
Ford has said that its customers can access the “vast majority” of Tesla’s charging network using an adapter. The old V-2 Superchargers and V3 stalls won’t be available to Ford owners. “We’re supply constrained as we move forward. Demand will exceed supply, but we’ll try to accommodate that on a first-come, first-served basis,” Ford’s US President Derrick Williams said.
The Intercept, Raw Story, and AlterNet have filed a lawsuit
Three media publications have filed lawsuits in the US against OpenAI and Microsoft over alleged copyright infringement. The publications alleged that OpenAI and Microsoft were aware of potential copyright infringement. They said that some of the time CHATGPL reproduces works of journalism without giving Author, Title, copyright or terms of use information. They added that ChatGPT responses violated third-party copyrights.
This is why the Apple car died
Apple CEO Tim Cook, in an interview with Bloomberg, said one purpose of self-driving cars is to “work on autonomy”. “It’s probably one of the most difficult AI projects actually to work on and so autonomy is something that’s incredibly exciting for us,” he added. Apple was in early talks to develop a self-driving car with manufacturers, reports had earlier claimed.
In Arizona, abortion politics are playing out in the campaign trail
US Senatoriate from Arizona, Democrat Gabrielle Gallego, has said that the Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling on abortion is a “political gift” to her opponent, Republicankari Lake. She was responding to Lake who had supported the overturn of abortion’s legality because she viewed it as a state’s rights issue. According to Lake, abortions are banned in Arizona except for saving a mother’s life.
The Supreme Court focused a lot on the social media aspects of the case
The US Supreme Court heard arguments in a pair of cases that revolve around social media laws passed by Texas and Florida. The laws aim to counter what the lawmakers have labelled censorship by social media platforms. However, NetChoice argued that the laws did not respect the rights of platforms to exercise editorial discretion in what they show on their sites.
The Odysseus moon landers won’t work after sideways landing
NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter shared a photo of the US-led Odysseus mission’s first Moon landing near the south pole of the moon. Odysseus, built by Lockheed Martin, landed within around two kilometres of its intended target near the Malapert A crater. Odysseus was launched in March and only had a week to operate before the long lunar night set in.
There are challenges to Texas and Florida social media laws
US Supreme Court will hear a case related to Florida and Texas laws that prohibit social media firms from banning people based on political viewpoint. The social media firms have said the laws are unconstitutional as they limit their freedom of expression. The case revolves around laws that make it a crime to knowingly post content that can be viewed by over 1 billion people.